ext_36142 ([identity profile] truecatachresis.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tigerfort 2008-08-09 11:07 am (UTC)

There's not really much of a discussion to be had there - the Bechdel test is a useful rule, but it just doesn't always apply, and some SF is one of the areas it's just not useful. It's a simple test that can be telling, but it doesn't actually measure any more than "Does X pass the Bechdel test?" - you have to actualy discuss the piece in question to determine why it fails, and some things have legitimate reasons to fail it. A work of SF dealing with the issues you've mentioned is already at least thinking about issues of gender, which means in a sense it's passed part of what the Bechdel test makes us think about - of course, some such works fail any further examination.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting