Tigerfort ([identity profile] tigerfort.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tigerfort 2008-08-14 10:19 am (UTC)

I'd agree with some of that, but not all. In particular, some of my examples were non-random. McCaffrey's brain-ships, for example, very often fall into very gender-typical roles (and certainly have strong gendering; they also almost invariably get paired up with an opposite-sex partner, but hey...). There isn't any consideration of the gender issues, or even of the technological issues - it's just a plot device to keep one major character fixed in place all the time.

But I should probably have expressed myself better in the original post :)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting