Ask the webternets: Printers
Jan. 15th, 2012 02:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I seem to need a new printer; my current one's marvellous millipede impression (an endless supply of last legs) seems to have finally come to an end. Since I last bought a printer in the 1990s, I'm hoping that people might be able to provide some advice.
I don't print a huge amount of stuff, currently - in fact, I think lack of use is a contributing factor to the final death of my existing printer. So ideally I want something that will still work if I ignore it for three months (if it absolutely has to be used to print a page every four weeks, that's probably OK, but if it'll sulk after being turned off for a week I'm not interested). I'm not honestly bothered either way about colour - all other things being equal it's an advantage, but not one I'm willing to pay very much for either at purchase time or over the life of the printer. Forward compatibility dictates use of USB connectivity (or ethernet, but I imagine networked printers are more expensive), and I'm actively opposed to wireless. (I won't refuse to buy a printer that has wireless capability, so long as I can turn it off, but I'm not going to use it.)
I don't need a multi-function machine, but have no particular objections if it's going to get me the best actual printer for my money, provided it isn't insanely huge.
Ten years ago I'd have obviously wanted (and actually got) a laser rather than an inkjet, for the better output quality, lower cost-per-page, and greater tolerance for being ignored for a month. Does that still apply? More specifically, can anyone recommend (or anti-recommend) specific models and/or ranges for my needs? (The deceased model is an HP laserjet 1100, for quality-comparison purposes.)
I don't print a huge amount of stuff, currently - in fact, I think lack of use is a contributing factor to the final death of my existing printer. So ideally I want something that will still work if I ignore it for three months (if it absolutely has to be used to print a page every four weeks, that's probably OK, but if it'll sulk after being turned off for a week I'm not interested). I'm not honestly bothered either way about colour - all other things being equal it's an advantage, but not one I'm willing to pay very much for either at purchase time or over the life of the printer. Forward compatibility dictates use of USB connectivity (or ethernet, but I imagine networked printers are more expensive), and I'm actively opposed to wireless. (I won't refuse to buy a printer that has wireless capability, so long as I can turn it off, but I'm not going to use it.)
I don't need a multi-function machine, but have no particular objections if it's going to get me the best actual printer for my money, provided it isn't insanely huge.
Ten years ago I'd have obviously wanted (and actually got) a laser rather than an inkjet, for the better output quality, lower cost-per-page, and greater tolerance for being ignored for a month. Does that still apply? More specifically, can anyone recommend (or anti-recommend) specific models and/or ranges for my needs? (The deceased model is an HP laserjet 1100, for quality-comparison purposes.)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-15 07:40 am (UTC)Random data point: the "starter" toner cartridges supplied with the 2007 colour laser lasted forever (something like 3 years at my rather low consumption rate).
Since arriving in NZ I bought a similar print/scan/copy inkjet for all of $57 (£29), and (having given away the previous laser before leaving Blighty) I am thinking of getting a networked colour laser to use as a household printer to stop my machine being the bottleneck. (Either that or I learn how to set my machine up as a print server for windows clients, but I suspect that the $400 such a machine would cost me is a smaller price to pay than the cost to my sanity...)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-15 03:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-15 08:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-15 09:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-15 01:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-01-15 06:27 pm (UTC)